 |
| Kevin Connolly Collection |
On the occasion of his 85th birthday,
Houdini Himself has posted this rare signed still of Tony Curtis from the 1953 film
Houdini
(“Joe” is Joe Dunniger, btw). What’s cool about this is, aside from a quick glimpse in the film, this is the first still I’ve seen of Curtis recreating this famous Houdini pose.
Recreating this pose has become de rigor publicity for the men who have played Houdini. Who did it best? You decide.
 |
| Glaser, Schaech, and Bentley assume the pose |
 |
| The real deal |
Posts
Curtis and Schaech both did it right, in different ways. Curtis approached it with more of a friendly, smiling candor (which is appropriate for a press shot), and he captures Houdini's photogenic charm. Schaech's pose, on the other hand, goes for authenticity---his pose looks the most like the original photo. It helps that he has a similar (if more hulky) physiology to Houdini, and whoever designed the shot actually bothered to get the lighting and the locks and chains right. So authentically speaking, Schaech's pose is best...but I think Curtis has more charm in his pose (Schaech looks too much like he's glowering at the camera).
ReplyDeleteGlaser is squatting, rather than bending, which looks all wrong (plus his photo isn't lit right...his shadow is too prominent). Bentley's expression is right, but he seems to be going for a ready-to-act rather than a solid stance...which is fine, but the spread-apart legs don't carry the same feel that Houdini's mostly symmetrical pose does.