Wednesday, July 29, 2020

The photo Houdini thought would fool Conan Doyle


On January 6, 1922, Houdini wrote a peculiar letter to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle which, as far as I know, has never been discussed in the many books and articles written about the famous friends. The letter itself is reproduced in full in the 1932 book, Houdini and Conan Doyle: The Story of a Strange Friendship. Here it is in full:

My dear Sir Arthur Conan Doyle:--
        Along with this letter I am sending you a photograph which I think will interest you.
        This photograph was secured about four months ago, while my new photoplay called "Haldane of the Secret Service" was in the making. In this photoplay I portrayed the son of a murder high police official, and, in one of the scenes, but on my way from the Club, I meet a young lady who is running madly down the street before pursuing thugs. She runs in my arms for protection.
        We had a cameraman on the scene, to make an instantaneous photograph of the action, and the result was the picture I am sending to you. This is not a trick picture, that I know. It is not a double exposure, how would you explain it? Does it look like ectoplasm?
         The gentleman with the straw hat is your good friend Houdini. The girl, whose face is unfortunately turned away from the camera, is Miss Gladys Leslie. She also cannot account for the picture.
         You will note that the figures of the persons making up the crowd on the sidewalk are sharply defined. They are watching the action and, as you can see, were greatly interested. I should like to have your opinion regarding the picture.
          I am playing a brief tour, but letters directed to my home address will always reach me.
          Very best regards and with hardest greetings for the new year,
                                                                 Sincerely yours,
                                                                                    Houdini.

Conan Doyle did not take the bait, writing back:

The effect is certainly produced by the whisk of lady's dress as she rushed into your protective arms. It then wrapped itself 'round her legs. It is certainly not ectoplasm!

It's likely the reason this exchange doesn't get attention is no one had seen the photo in question. But in 2017 I had the great pleasure of visiting the collection of Fred Pittella, and among his photos is the one I've shared at the top of this post. This is almost certainly the photo Houdini is talking about as it is a perfect match in all regards.

But ectoplasm?

There is no way Houdini was confused by this effect, which is a photographic blur exactly as Doyle describes. There's also a double exposure in this photo. The faint figure of Houdini in his straw hat can been seen to the right of Houdini and Gladys Leslie. Is this "ghostly" image what Houdini is talking about in the letter to Doyle? It's not entirely clear.

Whether it be the double exposure or the photographic burr, all I can think is Houdini is testing the famously gullible Doyle. It could be Houdini wanted to entrap the great man; have his very own Cottingley Fairies photo that he could later hold up and an example of Doyle's naiveté. But this doesn't seem like a terrible friendly thing to do, and I can't help but think Doyle recognized the trap. Maybe it's telling that later that same the year Doyle would attempt to snare Houdini with the Atlantic City seance. If anything, it shows the men were playing mind games well before their famous split.

Years earlier Houdini had given Doyle something that was certainly more to his liking. This is also in Fred's collection. It's a copy of the book After Death–What? Spiritistic Phenomena and Their Interpretation by Cesare Lombroso. Houdini inscribed book (below), and Doyle added on the cover page, "One of the Classics on the subject."


Thank you Fred!

Related:

7 comments:

  1. I can just hear Doyle reading the letter and saying, "Are you kidding me?" because surely they've both seen way better questionable photos. Maybe Harry was bored and felt like having a laugh. Was there a "P.S. I have acquired some swamp land that may also interest you"? ;)

    [The gentleman with the straw hat is your good friend Houdini.]

    That's just too cute.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Except that Doyle observed a photo of paper cut outs of fairies and claimed them to be real. So he was not above flights of fancy. I can see where HH was coming from in this photo.

      Delete
  2. Oh my gosh, this brings me right back to that magical feeling day at Fred’s! I am still so thankful you guys insisted I come along. Seeing this picture brings back floods of memories, and your historical contextualization makes it all the more awesome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was a great day indeed! I remember how we both were really excited by this just as an unpublished photo. It was a good year later that I was reading the Ernst book and realized that it was THIS photo.

      Delete
    2. Yes! We were just so understandably overwhelmed by the flood of HH history present in Fred’s awesome apartment-museum that the actual significance of anything was too much to expect in the moment. And I am so happy to see you further process it all and put these mysteries together. It is an experience that keeps on giving :)

      Delete
  3. These 3 globs of light can be explained by me. 2 are bouncung off those pole or metallic pillars located behind the people in the background. In addition looking at Houdini and Ms.Leslie, you can see another globe of light mid way on their b of its. What I see is a triangular defection of light bouncing off the poles and them. The photographer had to be using a triangular light flash with circular bulbs. I know about various lighting systems and the importance of "shining the light" on subjects as I was trained decades ago working as a "light man" for a photographer. Light can and will bounce around and appear in rather funny ways especially, when you see the photos after developing them. How many times have we used our "smart phones" taking pictures only to have to rephoto them due to some unexpected light ruining the photograph? So, as mentioned, Houdini was being facetious with Sir Author Conan Doyle. Benjilini

    ReplyDelete
  4. Clearly a psychic pseudopod reaching for HH's midsection.

    ReplyDelete

Legal Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Translate

Receive updates via email