Hollywood is hot to make a movie about Houdini. But what kind of movie is something the dream factory can't seem to figure out. Here's a rundown of all the Houdini projects currently in development to my knowledge. Which one of these, if any, will break free from Development Hell? That's the real mystery.
The most recently announced Houdini project is a two-night television miniseries with Adrien Brody attached to star (working title: Houdini). Reports say the miniseries "traces the arc of the turn-of-the-20th-century master magician's life from desperate poverty to worldwide fame." Veteran TV producer Gerald W. Abrams (J.J. Abrams father) is attached as executive producer.
In May of this year Brody said they were still in the "beginning stages," but my spirit guide tells me the network has a finished screenplay by writer-director Nicholas Meyer (whose father, Bernard C. Meyer, wrote Houdini A Mind in Chains). See: History has a script for their Houdini miniseries.
Are we Wild about History's Houdini? Yes! Even though I'm still warming to the idea of Adrien Brody as Houdini, this is the project I'd most like to see made as it's the only one that appears to be approaching Houdini's story as a traditional biography. And History did a great job promoting their recent miniseries The Bible and The Hatfields and The McCoys, so this could be a real event.
UPDATE (8/19/14): IT'S ON! History greenlights Houdini miniseries.
Intrigued by the idea that Houdini might have once worked as a spy, in 2009 Summit Entertainment (which later merged with Lionsgate) picked up the feature-film rights to The Secret Life of Houdini by William Kalush and Larry Sloman. The studio announced plans to launch a fictional action adventure franchise "featuring a character who is part Indiana Jones and part Sherlock Holmes."
The project has since gone through a turbulent development. Jeff Nathanson was originally attached to write and direct, but that didn't seem to work out. Gary Ross and Joe Wright have both come and gone as potential directors. Now the project has a new screenplay by Noah Oppenheim and the most recent news is that Dean Parisot (Reds 2) is in talks to direct.
Are we Wild? I'm conflicted about this movie, just as I'm conflicted about the Secret Life book itself. Lionsgate certainly knows how to make, shape, and sell a movie for today's audience (The Hunger Games anyone?), but I'm not crazy about having something that further perpetuates the idea that Houdini was a secret agent. Despite my respect for the authors of the book, it's a theory I just can't get behind. And wasn't this movie already made in 1923 as Haldane of the Secret Service?
Can you believe this project has been in development for 40+ years? This isn't Development Hell, it's Development Purgatory. But at least they are still trying, and now the project has a screenplay by Scott Frank (Minority Report) and a director in Francis Lawrence (Water for Elephants). But the real mystery of this latest incarnation is the plot.
News reports in 2011 said the movie would be about Houdini falling in love with a beautiful spiritualist, which sounded a lot like Death Defying Acts. But my own Top Secret sources tell me the real plot is about Houdini and Chung Ling Soo working together to break a man out of prison. In fact, Chung Ling Soo plays as big a roll in the movie as Houdini. The script is also said to include a large element of the supernatural.
Are we Wild? Even though it's fiction, yes, I'm excited about this project. This feels more like an "untold" episode of Houdini's life, so it doesn't have that same stigma of rewriting history that the Lionsgate project has. But this company seems chronically incapable of getting Houdini on the screen, and I'm spooked that we haven't heard anything about this project in a few years.
In February 2011 Syfy announced plans to make Among the Spirits, a dramatic "steampunk" television series featuring Houdini and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle solving mysteries in the 1920s. The series would be written and produced by Steve Valentine and Paul Chart, and is reportedly based on a graphic novel of the same name (although I've never been able to track down a copy).
The announcement received a lot of press in 2011, but then nothing. Now word is the series has moved to NBC, but NBC has said nothing about it officially.
Are we Wild? Yeah, a little. I'm not turning cartwheels over the concept, but I think it has potential and I'd love a weekly Houdini TV series to blog about. And if they really drilled down and studied Houdini's spirit investigations, they could come up with some great episodes. Margery as the season finale? Could be fun.
In 2011 DreamWorks purchased the original screenplay Voices from the Dead from screenwriter J. Michael Straczynski. The script finds Harry Houdini and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle teaming up with a psychic to solve a set of murders in 1920's New York. Yes, it's pretty much the same idea as the Syfy/NBC series, and maybe it's not a coincidence that it was purchased in the same month. It's also the same idea of a half-dozen books and graphic novels, yet it reportedly sold because of the "originality" of the idea. Amazing. Since the purchase, there has been no news.
Are we Wild? While I want a Houdini feature film, a Houdini-Doyle mash-up feels done to death. And, again, do we really want to see Houdini as a detective?
Back in July 2012 The Hollywood Reporter broke the "exclusive" news that Chuck co-creator Chris Fedak had been hired to write an untitled Houdini project for Walden Media. According to the report, the story centers on "an unsuspecting high schooler who finds himself in grave danger when he discovers a family secret leading back to the legendary illusionist." Mark Waters is attached to produce and direct through his Watermark Pictures.
Walden's Houdini project has actually been in development since 2006, with Brett Merryman writing the initial screenplay. But it sounds like it received new life with Fedak, although there hasn't been any fresh news on the project in over a year.
Are we Wild? Ambivalent. It's a movie for kids, and from the description, it sounds like it's set in contemporary times. So it's not really a movie about Houdini himself. Maybe Hollywood should realize how much kids love the Tony Curtis Houdini biopic.
UPDATE (5/19/14): Houdini escapes Walden Media.
In 2012, 20th Century Fox-based Chernin Entertainment purchased the film rights to Brian Selznick's illustrated children's book The Houdini Box. The book tells the story of a young boy who receives a box from Houdini just before the magician's death. Adventure ensues.
In 2013 Chernin announced that Irish filmmaker Kealan O'Rourke would write and direct the project. O'Rourke is a veteran of short films and animation, The Houdini Box would mark his feature film debut.
Are we Wild? I have the same feelings about this as I have about the Walden project, although at least this one is set in Houdini's day and will have at least one scene with the magician. Also, with O'Rourke's background, I wonder if they are considering making this an animated feature? I always though Disney missed the boat by not making an animated Houdini musical in the 1990s.
Based on the superb 2001 novel, Carter Beats The Devil by Glen David Gold -- which features Houdini in a small but significant role -- this project has long been in development. Paramount originally optioned the book in 2002 for Tom Cruise to star and produce. Once that deal lapsed, AMC took a stab at turning it into a TV series. That also didn't work out.
Then in 2010 the project got back on track when Michael Gilio was tapped to write the screenplay with Jon Shestack producing for Warner Bros. Last year it was reported that 21 Jump Street directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller were in talks to direct.
Are we Wild? Sure, it's a great book. Not really a Houdini movie... Still, I'll take it.
Based on Thomas Wheeler's fantasy-adventure novel, The Arcanum finds Houdini, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (look DreamWorks -- so original!), H.P. Lovecraft and Marie Laveau teaming up to fight demons in 1919 New York. Wheeler penned the screenplay which was first purchased by Miramax in 1999. Gold Circle acquired the property in 2004. In 2007 it was reported that writer/director Randall Wallace (The Man in the Iron Mask) had signed aboard to direct. No word since then.
Are we Wild? Meh. Sounds like The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, and these multi-historical character action mash-ups never seem to work. But I'd see it!
In January 2010 Paramount has picked up rights to Boilerplate: History’s Mechanical Marvel, a graphic novel-picture book hybrid by Paul Guinan and Anina Bennett. The book tells the story of the world's first robot, "Boilerplate", who has a Forrest Gump-like series of adventures. These apparently include working alongside Houdini in silent films. J.J. Abrams Bad Robot is attached to produce.
Are we Wild? I actually like the sound of this movie, and having a scene or two with Houdini certainly doesn't hurt. But I think J.J. is a little busy these days.
"Modern-Day Houdini" - ABC
ABC has now thrown their hat into the Houdini development ring and is working on a "Modern-Day Houdini" TV series. David Hoberman's ABC-based production company, Mandeville, is developing the project with writers Jeff Addis and Will Matthews. It's said to follow "legendary illusionist Harry Houdini" who "partners with an unusually gifted female detective to solve the cases that baffle the LAPD."
I've since learned that it's actually Houdini's spirit returned from the beyond to help fight modern day crime. Okay...
Are we Wild? As silly as this concept sounds, I like the idea of a weekly Houdini TV series enough that I could live with this for a season or two. Bring on Ghost Harry!
Houdini-Hollywood sign images by the multi-talented Tom Interval of Houdini Museum.
Man, I wish someone is daring enough to do a female "Houdini" movie of some sort.ReplyDelete
That would be cool.Delete
Different subject but something I've long thought about. We all know the story of Bess being buried in a catholic cemetery and not next to Houdini. Should there not be a discussion about moving Bess remains to her rightful place besides her husband? I can't imagine that the cemetery in Queens would raise any issue and don't we all believe she should be with Harry? There are no religious doctrines that forbid a spouse of a different religion from being buried anywhere they like.ReplyDelete
A better place this discussion would be HERE I think.Delete
This would be up to Bessie's family. She was buried by her family in a cemetery with other family members, including her mother and father. Bess was very close with her family and sisters, especially after Houdini's death when she really went on to a new life. I don't know. I think it's a shame she's not with Houdini. But I don't think it's incorrect where she is.
And at least she isn't buried in Needles, which, believe it or not, could have happened (I'll bring that info out in a future post).
I hope that Ron Howard biopic comes through. I don't even care if he alters and twists as many things in Houdini's life story as he did in John Nash's life story ("A Beautiful Mind"), I just want a goddamn biopic already! I can only hope that it won't be some shitty cheesefest (given Ron Howard's - ahem - style), but I'd rather have that than nada.ReplyDelete
As for History casting Adrien Brody in their project to be Houdini - ehhh, he seems too lanky and floppy-haired and puppy-eyed. Even Hugh Jackman, though he also looks nothing like Houdini, somehow seems more cut out for the part. (However, I could be entirely mistaken about Brody's fit).
I dunno, if I were casting Houdini, I wouldn't be looking at tall, hunky types, I'd be looking at men of short-to-average height, guys who are lightweights and middleweights. Houdini was not a huge hulking dude, he was a powerfully-built little dynamo. I'd also be looking at actors who perhaps vaguely resemble Houdini, but more importantly, can pull off Houdini's charismatic personality.
Some actors I've thought might make good choices for the part of Houdini in a full-length rags-to-riches-to-movies-to-spiritualism kind of biopic have been actors such as:
- Tobey Maguire (who might have been a more bankable choice when he was still making "Spiderman" movies. But it was his weirdly similar-looking face that got my attention)
- Johnny Depp (if Tim Burton had made a Houdini movie about 15 years ago, [before Tim Burton started sucking] starring Johnny Depp, that could have been SO AWESOME. He could have even cast Helena Bonham Carter as Bess, and I wouldn't have minded).
- Elijah Wood (still a possible choice. He still young, he has amazing acting chops, and has the right build, and could possibly give off the right amount of charisma. But I guess Hollywood thinks differently...)
- Daniel Radcliffe (still very young, and maybe needs a bit more experience outside of the Harry Potter franchise, but he looks a teeny tiny tad like Houdini, and he's about the right height (5'5"). He also loves doing stunt work whenever directors allow him to do it, and I think he'd be more than willing to do the tonnes of hours of physical training necessary to get something close to Houdini's build. But I guess Radcliffe hasn't made enough films post-Harry Potter franchise to be considered for Hollywood to consider him for this part. Or...maybe this is just the big kind of film he needs? Also: Harry Potter -> Harry Houdini? The press would LOL. But who cares about what the press would think).
Wow, Daniel Radcliffe. What an interesting idea. I've never considered that, but I could really see that.Delete
I should be clearer on the Imagine project; I can't say I know for certain that it will be a biopic or that Ron Howard himself would be directing. It's just being done by his company.
Ah, I see, it could just be Ron Howard-produced, or merely Ron Howard-owned. But I'd be intrigued as to who might direct such a feature, if not him.ReplyDelete
And I'm glad someone else thinks Radcliffe could have Houdini-potential. :)
Bess is buried with her brother and law John A Hinson at gates of heaven in ny.no one else my grandmother was supposed to be buried there. But she died up her in mass and buried her in mass.ReplyDelete
Did you maybe mean to leave this comment on another post, John?Delete
Good info nevertheless. :)